No news from Iceland… why?

為什麼看不到冰島新聞？因為他們： - 辭退整個政府 - 把銀行國有化 - 公投，讓國民決定經濟債務方案(結果93%反對還款給英國及荷蘭，因為他們的借貸充滿問題及漏洞) ⋯⋯ ... - 拘捕主要的銀行家及總裁，要他們為經濟崩塌付上責任 - 人民重寫憲法 - 抗爭都是和平進行，並且達成目標。 為什麼媒體不報導？如果其他國家的人民都以此為參考發起行動，這是當權者及銀行家的末日吧。 恢復調查求證、求救、待救不如自救，當時雷曼亦是滙豐單一最大股東，證監及金融管理局等，與任志剛、纪勤、王冬勝、鄭海泉、李國寶、王守業等早已證實是順藤摸瓜，上下其手，互相包庇，多年來以機制及行政手段來延誤，更已證實是蛇鼠一窩 No news from Iceland… why? How come we hear everything that happens in Egypt but no news about what’s happening in Iceland: … In Iceland, the people has made the government resign, the primary banks have been nationalized, it was decided to not pay the debt that these created with Great Britain and Holland due to their bad financial politics and a public assembly has been created to rewrite the constitution. And all of this in a peaceful way. A whole revolution against the powers that have created the current crisis. This is why there hasn’t been any publicity during the last two years: What would happen if the rest of the EU citizens took this as an example? What would happen if the US citizens took this as an example. This is a summary of the facts: 2008. The main bank of the country is nationalized. The Krona, the currency of Iceland devaluates and the stock market stops. The country is in bankruptcy 2008. The citizens protest in front of parliament and manage to get new elections that make the resignation of the prime minister and his whole government. The country is in bad economic situation. A law proposes paying back the debt to Great Britain and Holland through the payment of 3,500 million euros, which will be paid by the people of Iceland monthly during the next 15 years, with a 5.5% interest. 2010. The people go out in the streets and demand a referendum. In January 2010 the president denies the approval and announces a popular meeting. In March the referendum and the denial of payment is voted in by 93%. Meanwhile the government has initiated an investigation to bring to justice those responsible for the crisis, and many high level executives and bankers are arrested. The Interpol dictates an order that make all the implicated parties leave the country. In this crisis an assembly is elected to rewrite a new Constitution which can include the lessons learned from this, and which will substitute the current one (a copy of the Danish Constitution). 25 citizens are chosen, with no political affiliation, out of the 522 candidates. For candidacy all that was needed was to be an adult and have the support of 30 people. The constitutional assembly starts in February of 2011 to present the ‘carta magna’ from the recommendations given by the different assemblies happening throughout the country. It must be approved by the current Parliament and by the one constituted through the next legislative elections. So in summary of the Icelandic revolution: -resignation of the whole government -nationalization of the bank. -referendum so that the people can decide over the economic decisions. -incarcerating the responsible parties -rewriting of the constitution by its people Have we been informed of this through the media? Has any political program in radio or TV commented on this? No! The Icelandic people have been able to show that there is a way to beat the system and has given a democracy lesson to the world