About Bank of China bank frauds as conducted by Chan H F, Jeffrey / Bank of China
In his letter about mis-selling of Octave Notes, the staff records from HKMA show that the seller was not bank staff of Bank of China after 2009, so the letter as attached shows no evidence of investigation of the cases by BOC Jeffrey Chan and no proof of investigation were done by Bank of China and the bank is committing bank frauds during the so called investigations.
There were no mentioning of suggestion of subscription of Trust fund with relavant documents before sales of false bonds.
There were no evidence the bank got true documents ready for sales of these products as no real documents were mentioned in the letters but copies.
There are no explaining of what is the risk of the products even in their reply letters and where were the relevant documents secretly hidden in the banks for CCB to search these document thru court order.
There were no mentioning of risk of product being told by any bank staffs against my complaint statement in the telephone with bank which they should have recording this year under the old and new codes by HKMA.
There are no mentioning of how the investigation told me the risk of the products being explained to me (thru hands, eyes or body?)
From my knowlege with other banks customers of many banks about their investigation of mis-selling of Minibonds and other related products, Bank of China replied letters are different from all other banks and these letters contained many evidence that these investigation people are still committing banks frauds on their own letters.
0 則留言:
發佈留言
訂閱 發佈留言 [Atom]
<< 首頁